I Can't Tell If I Agree With This

Arnuld!

OK so my train of thought went like this: So, they say that he supports the kid. Good. What an admirable thing to do. Most illegitimate children don't get finical support. He provided it. But are they being sarcastic? I can't tell. Because I can't really imagine what a woman's magazine would say about that not telling people about it, for ten years. I can't imagine them saying it was a good situation. Next paragraph, they talk about how he interviewed with the site and he said that family was of utmost importance to him. But could he be telling the truth? Supporting the family sounds a  lot like being there for them. While he is not a father figure, the child had a stepdad (I presume. The article said that both of them were married. Just not to each other. That assumes a father for the kid, yes?). It sounds to me like a cover up for a political career. But I have to say....I like Arnold. He was a good governor. He slowed the downhill economic trend a significant amount. There's not a whole lot one person can do to change the course of a state; not in democracy anyway. I think it was beneficial to the state to have him as governor. I dunno. Worth it.